Monday, September 19, 2011
Race Report: Erie Marathon (aka. Taking Care of Unfinished Business...)
As crazy as it sounds, I ran the Erie Marathon yesterday (9/18). After the disappointing run at Rev3 Cedar Point last week, I was beginning to question my running training leading up to the race. Deep down, I knew that I had trained appropriately, but I had an urge to prove it to myself.
My father-in-law had been training for the Erie Half-Marathon (which is run at the same time as the full-marathon) for the past several months and I originally planned to ride up there with him to be a spectator. By Thursday night, my plans had changed. I didn't do anything at all after the Ironman last week, but on Thursday night while I was laying on the floor stretching out, I realized that my legs actually were feeling really good. I had gotten over almost all of the soreness and fatigue from the race and I began to wonder, would it be crazy to actually enter the marathon? I ultimately decided no, it was not crazy and I decided to register for the race. I thought back to all of the tempo runs and all of the long runs I had completed leading up to Rev3 Cedar Point. I felt like I had really "wasted" them on a 4:30:00 marathon last week.
I arrived in Erie with my father-in-law on Saturday afternoon and picked up my race packet. This was by far the most lacksadaisical I had ever felt for a big race. I had no plans or expectations, I just wanted to go out and run fast. That's it. I didn't even really have any racing clothes with me. Just normal running shorts and a t-shirt. Although, I did make the decision to wear my CEP compression socks (which I had previously only used for recovery) for the race, given my Ironman effort last week. I think this ended up being a great decision because I felt no pain whatsoever in my legs and they actually felt suprisingly fresh during the race. To be honest, I think I may experiement with wearing the compression socks in more racing situations.
The race started at 7:00 AM on a cool morning in Presque Isle State Park. For the entire race, the temperature ranged from 57-63 degrees F. Now that is my kind of racing weather! The course consisted of 2 big loops around the penninsula that juts out into Lake Erie. Each loop was exactly 13.1 miles. Many portions of the course ran alongside the shore of Lake Erie and the cool breeze was very refreshing.
I started off the race very conservatively. My training for Rev3 Cedar Point had been focused around preparing for a 3:00:00 marathon because most of what I had read said that you should plan to run 30 minutes slower in the Ironman marathon than in an open marathon (but, we all know that wasn't true for me last week!). So, I figured that I probably would've had the legs to run about 3:00:00 if I was completely fresh, but I decided to be conservative and shoot for a sub-3:10:00 (which is the Boston Marathon qualifying time for my age group) given the circumstances of last week. I decided that I would run no mile slower than 7:15 and no faster than 7:00 and would just have fun with it.
The first several miles many runners went out very, very fast. I can't seem to understand why this happens in marathons because you would expect the people up front must have at least some experience in long distance running, but it always does. I tried to team up with a couple of groups of runners, but they all began to drop me around the 5-10 mile mark as they were speeding up their paces. I held steady at ~7:05 and cranked through the miles. I was feeling fantastic! I felt like I was just out for an easy weekend long run which I had done so many times over the past several months. They had Gu Electrolyte Brew (one of my favorite electrolyte drinks!) out on the course and I took in 3-4 ounces every aid station. I went through the half-marathon split in 1:31:56. Perfect. I knew that I would come in under 3:10:00 at the finish and continued to run comfortably and have fun. Slowly, many of the runners who had dropped me earlier in the race started to come back to me. I had made mental notes on what a few specific runners were wearing and particularly enjoyed passing by them in the second half of the race (I'm sure you can relate to the feeling!). I continued to run in the low-7:00's and never really had any point in the race where I was running outside of the comfort zone. Before I knew it I was crossing the finish line well under 3:10:00. I was very pleased with the race and felt more confident about my run training given that I could run a Boston qualifier without any major discomfort. Now, I just need to decide this week if I am going to register for Boston!
TIME: 3:06:11, 17th Overall, 8th M 25-29
Race Report: Rev3 Cedar Pont Full Rev
I've had a few days to recover from my first full-Ironman distance triathlon on 9/11 and just now I'm finally feeling up to the task of reflecting back on the race and posting a race report. Overall, I am incredibly pleased to have completed the grueling 140.6 mile course on my first attempt! Finishing was my #1 goal, and I achieved it. However, I am left feeling like I have a little bit of "unfinished business" with this particular distance. Read on to find out why...
I arrived in Sandusky, OH on Saturday afternoon and checked in at the Breakers Hotel inside Cedar Point Amusement Park. It turned out the be a great place to stay because the Lake Erie beach and the swim start were literally just steps down the hall from my room, so it was very convenient on race day for both me and my cheering section (Jess, Mom, and Dad). The race expo was average...nothing too exciting about it...but I wasn't really interested in walking around the expo. Registration and bike check-in were uneventful. It was a nice touch by the Rev3 people to have personalized race numbers and bike rack plates. They also took a picture of me at check-in which they later displayed on the big screen when I crossed the finish line. I had registered for this race fairly early, so I had a good race number (57) and therefore was on the first row for the transition bags and the first row for the bike rack. It made it easy to find my stuff during the race. After checking in my bike and dropping off my transition bags, I headed back to the hotel and we ate dinner at the TGI Friday's inside the hotel. I then headed up to the room to turn in for the night at about 8:00 PM. I really didn't sleep much that night (as I had expected), but when the alarm went off at 4:00 AM, I felt refreshed and ready to go.
I ate breakfast when I woke up and then headed back to transition to top off the air in the tires. I then headed back to the Breakers Hotel and got dressed for the race and walked down to the beach. I put my wetsuit on, swam a few strokes in the lake to make sure everything felt right, and then lined up on the beach for my 7:05 AM start. The age grouper wave started 10:00 behind the male pros and 5:00 behind the female pros.
SWIM: 1:16:12
When the air horn blew and I was running into the water, I think my heart rate instantly shot up to 180 bpm...at least if felt like it! After all the anticipation, it was finally here! The swim was pretty uneventful and I stuck to my plan of swimming a bit out to the left of the counter-clockwise triangular course to avoid the traffic. This was my first big mass swim start, so I got a little bit stressed with all the kicking and jockeying for position, but by the first turn buoy, things started to settle down and I was able to settle into my pacing strategy. My plan had been to swim very comfortably (~2:00 /100m) and come out of the water feeling fresh. Swimming is by far my slowest event and I knew that it would be a long day and I hoped to have plenty of time to make up ground on the bike and the run. When I got out of the water and my watch read about 75 minutes, I was thrilled. I ran up the beach about 100 m to transition and got ready to head out on the bike. At this point I was 87th age grouper.
T1: 4:08
BIKE: 5:07:24
I had trained HARD for the bike leg of this race and I had a feeling this would be my strongest event on the day. In training, I had managed to finally bring my functional threshold power (FTP) over the 4 W/kg barrier and planned to ride the 112 miles at a very conservative intensity factor (IF) of 0.68. IF is the normalized power (NP) divided by FTP. I started off on the bike course right on my target watts and kept the power variability low on the few inclines that I encountered on the coure. It was pretty flat for the most part. With all the excitement, riding at an IF of 0.68 felt VERY slow and easy and many people blew by me in the first 20-30 miles, but I kept telling myself, "it's a long day, I'll see the later on the course". I stuck to my plan and continued to crank out the miles. After about mile 30, my slow and steady pace started to overtake some riders. I went through the 56 mile marker at 2:34:00 feeling great. By mile 80, I was passing many more riders. The sun was out now and what was supposed to be an overcast, rainy day, had turned into a very sunny, hot day and the temperature slowly crept to 90 degrees F as I neared the end of the ride. I continued to take in a lot of water and calories. In the end, I think my nutrition and hydration strategies were executed perfectly. I arrived to T2 feeling great and as I was dismounting by bike I heard somebody yell "11th age grouper". 11th place!? I was very pleased to have passed 76 riders out on the bike and was feeling fantastic. My IF for the whole ride was exactly 1 W above my planned target of 0.68 and my variability index (VI), which is the NP/%FTP, was only a 1.03, meaning I had ridden at an extremely steady power output.
T2: 4:13
RUN: 4:31:01 (insert sad face)
I left T2 with all the confidence in the world. My run training had been solid and I knew that all I had to do at this point was hang on for about 3.5 hours and I would meet my goal of a sub-10 hour Ironman. The first 5 miles were a breeze. I was taking in plenty of calories and water at the aid stations every mile. I went through the 5 mile mark right on target: 39:31. I continued through the next 5 miles almost perfectly: 1:19:55 at the 10 mile marker. "I am going to nail this thing!", I thought. As I headed back to transition and the turn-around point at 13.1 miles, my legs started to feel heavy. I very quickly became aware of the 90 degree sun beating down on me. As I rounded the half-marathon and grabbed my special needs bag, I tried to guzzle some of the Red Bull I had packed in there. I hoped this would help. As I approached the 14 mile aid station I glanced down at my watch and realized my pace had dropped significantly. My heart rate was under control and I wasn't dehydrated, but my legs were simply just feeling incredibly fatigued. I felt like every foot strike was heavy and painful. I made the decision to walk through the aid station and try to get some extra calories in. Unfortunately, it all went downhill from there. When I tried to run again, it was essentially just a pitiful shuffle. The lengths of my walks through the aid stations each mile began to get longer and longer. It was everything I could do to just keep moving forward. Around mile 15, I started to drink the flat Coke. I was dumping ice and water over my head every mile. I continued in this manner until about mile 23, when I the draw of the finish line helped me to "run" it in the last 3.2 miles. By mile 25 I actually felt like a was starting to get my running legs back and was able to post a sub-8:00 mile. Unfortunately, I finished the marathon almost exactly 1 whole hour slower than I had planned, but I was incredibly happy to cross the finish line of my first 140.6.
TIME: 11:02:57, 49th overall, 9th M 25-29
In retrospect, I don't really have an answer for what went wrong during the run. I don't think that it was nutrition or hydration; I believe that my strategies on both the bike and the run were appropriate. I wasn't "bonking" or having GI issues. I simply had incredibly tired and painful legs. I was also extremely hot. Is this something that I should just chalk up to a lack of experience? I'm not really sure. Maybe if I had just taken one longer break when I started to slow down on the run to take in some calories, stretch my legs, and cool down, I could have gotten back on track with my planned pace. I don't think that I slacked on the run training. I feel like I had it in me to run a sub-3:30 marathon, but just didn't execute. Needless to say, I really feel like I have some unfinished business with the marthon distance and the 140.6...
I arrived in Sandusky, OH on Saturday afternoon and checked in at the Breakers Hotel inside Cedar Point Amusement Park. It turned out the be a great place to stay because the Lake Erie beach and the swim start were literally just steps down the hall from my room, so it was very convenient on race day for both me and my cheering section (Jess, Mom, and Dad). The race expo was average...nothing too exciting about it...but I wasn't really interested in walking around the expo. Registration and bike check-in were uneventful. It was a nice touch by the Rev3 people to have personalized race numbers and bike rack plates. They also took a picture of me at check-in which they later displayed on the big screen when I crossed the finish line. I had registered for this race fairly early, so I had a good race number (57) and therefore was on the first row for the transition bags and the first row for the bike rack. It made it easy to find my stuff during the race. After checking in my bike and dropping off my transition bags, I headed back to the hotel and we ate dinner at the TGI Friday's inside the hotel. I then headed up to the room to turn in for the night at about 8:00 PM. I really didn't sleep much that night (as I had expected), but when the alarm went off at 4:00 AM, I felt refreshed and ready to go.
I ate breakfast when I woke up and then headed back to transition to top off the air in the tires. I then headed back to the Breakers Hotel and got dressed for the race and walked down to the beach. I put my wetsuit on, swam a few strokes in the lake to make sure everything felt right, and then lined up on the beach for my 7:05 AM start. The age grouper wave started 10:00 behind the male pros and 5:00 behind the female pros.
SWIM: 1:16:12
When the air horn blew and I was running into the water, I think my heart rate instantly shot up to 180 bpm...at least if felt like it! After all the anticipation, it was finally here! The swim was pretty uneventful and I stuck to my plan of swimming a bit out to the left of the counter-clockwise triangular course to avoid the traffic. This was my first big mass swim start, so I got a little bit stressed with all the kicking and jockeying for position, but by the first turn buoy, things started to settle down and I was able to settle into my pacing strategy. My plan had been to swim very comfortably (~2:00 /100m) and come out of the water feeling fresh. Swimming is by far my slowest event and I knew that it would be a long day and I hoped to have plenty of time to make up ground on the bike and the run. When I got out of the water and my watch read about 75 minutes, I was thrilled. I ran up the beach about 100 m to transition and got ready to head out on the bike. At this point I was 87th age grouper.
T1: 4:08
BIKE: 5:07:24
I had trained HARD for the bike leg of this race and I had a feeling this would be my strongest event on the day. In training, I had managed to finally bring my functional threshold power (FTP) over the 4 W/kg barrier and planned to ride the 112 miles at a very conservative intensity factor (IF) of 0.68. IF is the normalized power (NP) divided by FTP. I started off on the bike course right on my target watts and kept the power variability low on the few inclines that I encountered on the coure. It was pretty flat for the most part. With all the excitement, riding at an IF of 0.68 felt VERY slow and easy and many people blew by me in the first 20-30 miles, but I kept telling myself, "it's a long day, I'll see the later on the course". I stuck to my plan and continued to crank out the miles. After about mile 30, my slow and steady pace started to overtake some riders. I went through the 56 mile marker at 2:34:00 feeling great. By mile 80, I was passing many more riders. The sun was out now and what was supposed to be an overcast, rainy day, had turned into a very sunny, hot day and the temperature slowly crept to 90 degrees F as I neared the end of the ride. I continued to take in a lot of water and calories. In the end, I think my nutrition and hydration strategies were executed perfectly. I arrived to T2 feeling great and as I was dismounting by bike I heard somebody yell "11th age grouper". 11th place!? I was very pleased to have passed 76 riders out on the bike and was feeling fantastic. My IF for the whole ride was exactly 1 W above my planned target of 0.68 and my variability index (VI), which is the NP/%FTP, was only a 1.03, meaning I had ridden at an extremely steady power output.
T2: 4:13
RUN: 4:31:01 (insert sad face)
I left T2 with all the confidence in the world. My run training had been solid and I knew that all I had to do at this point was hang on for about 3.5 hours and I would meet my goal of a sub-10 hour Ironman. The first 5 miles were a breeze. I was taking in plenty of calories and water at the aid stations every mile. I went through the 5 mile mark right on target: 39:31. I continued through the next 5 miles almost perfectly: 1:19:55 at the 10 mile marker. "I am going to nail this thing!", I thought. As I headed back to transition and the turn-around point at 13.1 miles, my legs started to feel heavy. I very quickly became aware of the 90 degree sun beating down on me. As I rounded the half-marathon and grabbed my special needs bag, I tried to guzzle some of the Red Bull I had packed in there. I hoped this would help. As I approached the 14 mile aid station I glanced down at my watch and realized my pace had dropped significantly. My heart rate was under control and I wasn't dehydrated, but my legs were simply just feeling incredibly fatigued. I felt like every foot strike was heavy and painful. I made the decision to walk through the aid station and try to get some extra calories in. Unfortunately, it all went downhill from there. When I tried to run again, it was essentially just a pitiful shuffle. The lengths of my walks through the aid stations each mile began to get longer and longer. It was everything I could do to just keep moving forward. Around mile 15, I started to drink the flat Coke. I was dumping ice and water over my head every mile. I continued in this manner until about mile 23, when I the draw of the finish line helped me to "run" it in the last 3.2 miles. By mile 25 I actually felt like a was starting to get my running legs back and was able to post a sub-8:00 mile. Unfortunately, I finished the marathon almost exactly 1 whole hour slower than I had planned, but I was incredibly happy to cross the finish line of my first 140.6.
TIME: 11:02:57, 49th overall, 9th M 25-29
In retrospect, I don't really have an answer for what went wrong during the run. I don't think that it was nutrition or hydration; I believe that my strategies on both the bike and the run were appropriate. I wasn't "bonking" or having GI issues. I simply had incredibly tired and painful legs. I was also extremely hot. Is this something that I should just chalk up to a lack of experience? I'm not really sure. Maybe if I had just taken one longer break when I started to slow down on the run to take in some calories, stretch my legs, and cool down, I could have gotten back on track with my planned pace. I don't think that I slacked on the run training. I feel like I had it in me to run a sub-3:30 marathon, but just didn't execute. Needless to say, I really feel like I have some unfinished business with the marthon distance and the 140.6...
Sunday, August 21, 2011
6 Hour Race Simulation Brick Done; Time to Taper for Rev3 Cedar Point
It's hard to believe Rev3 Cedar Point is almost here. Only 3 weeks from today and I will be racing in my first full-Ironman distance triathlon!
Today was a big workout for me. I've had it marked in red on my calendar for the past few months. It was my official "race simulation" bike/run brick. I woke up at 5:00 AM and ate the same breakfast I plan to eat on race day. I gathered my copious amount of water bottles together (as pictured above!) and headed out for an 85 mile ride at 7:00 AM. Thankfully, the weather stayed pretty cool (65-75 F) and overcast throughout most of the morning and I had a fantastic ride. I nailed my target power output within 1 watt of my planned race pace. I felt great as I finished the ride and am confident in both my pacing and nutrition strategy for the bike leg of the Ironman.
At the end of my ride, I rolled into the garage at home and made a quick transition and jumped on the treadmill to start my 15 mile run. Unfortunately, the clouds disappeared and the temperature quickly warmed up to the upper 80's F. Despite the fact that I was in the shaded garage with a big fan blowing directly on me, it sure was hot! Nonetheless, I still had a great run. I didn't have much problem hitting my target pace for the 15 miles. As I neared the end my run however, I realized that it is going to take a significant amount of "digging deep" on race day to suffer through the rest of the marathon. After working out for 6 hours straight, I was certainly ready to get of the treadmill and go inside to take a snooze!
Tomorrow is a complete rest day and then I'll begin the first of my 3 taper weeks. This volume for this first week of taper is only dialed back a bit, but it is still a nice feeling to know that my longest workouts are behind me! In general, as I taper I will be incrementally decreasing the volume but keeping the intensity relatively high. I will still be throwing in a handful of lactate threshold and vo2 max intervals on both the bike and the run to keep the "snap" in my legs until race day.
T-minus 3 weeks!
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Race Report: Hanes Park Classic Criterium (Second Crit Ever...First DNF Ever)
A couple of weeks ago, Mock Orange Bikes hosted the 33rd annual Hanes Park Classic Criterium series. I hadn't really planned to race, but I was getting a little burned out mentally from the monotony of training for Rev3 Cedar Point, so I decided to substitute my normal weekend long ride for an "easy" 30 minute criterium. I got an ample warm up in on Sunday morning of a bit over an hour and then rode over to Hanes Park in the West End Village of Winston-Salem and registered for the Cat 4/5 race.
As I wheeled up to the starting line, I knew in my mind that there was probably nobody in this race who had logged as many hours as me on the bike over the past 3 months. I knew I was ready to drop the hammer in this race. I admittedly have essentially no experience in criteriums, but I was hoping that I could use my better-than-normal conditioning to "muscle" out a podium spot. The gun went off and I took a good position in the top 10. I rode a couple of laps of the 2 mile course in this position to get a feel for the turns (and also to stay out of all of the congestion in the back of the peleton). Over the next few laps, I took plenty of turns pulling at the front and comfortably started to ramp up the pace. Riders were slowly beginning to shed off of the back and I could feel things starting to thin out up front. I sat back a couple more laps and then took another turn at the front. I pulled hard to thin out the remaining riders. My legs felt incredible and I knew I was going to have a lot of "matches" left to burn at the end of this race. I mentally planned to make my break with 2 laps to go in order to avoid any chance of a sprint finish. I eased off the gas a bit as we rounded the last few corners until we hit the line for 2 laps to go. As we came around the last curve before we crossed the line, I heard somebody coming up hard on the outside. The guy was riding erratically and made a sharp cut in front of me as we came out of the curve. I knew in an instant that my race was over. As he cut me off, my front wheel got completely mangled in his rear skewer. I heard the shearing of spokes and felt my front wheel start to lock up. I remember thinking, "man, this is really gonna hurt", as I expected this to end in me hitting the deck HARD. Thankfully, I managed to stay up, but unfortunately, my race was over.
Despite the fact that this race was my first DNF in any sort of race ever, I'm glad that I raced in this crit. It reaffirmed for me how important smart riding technique is in criteriums. You certainly need a strong "engine", but strategy and technique is so much more important in criterium racing than any other style of racing I have done. Criteriums really give me an adrenaline rush that is different from what I experience in triathlons or running races. I think that I see a few more crits in my future...
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Product Review: Plain Maltodextrin vs. Infinit Nutrition
Most people who get involved in triathlons quickly realize that it can be a rather expensive hobby. One aspect of the sport that can really hurt the pocketbook is the ever-expanding world of "sports nutrition." Really, since Gatorade was invented and popularized in the 1960's, athletes have felt the need to buy a variety of designer products to fuel their training and competitive endeavors. It seems like every 5 years or so, there is always something new, that you need to have because it will make you faster. Now I'm not one to downplay advances in science and technology, and there is still certainly a lot to understand about human physiology, but what one has to realize is that human physiology isn't changing. If a method of fueling for an endurance event works for you today, it's still going to work just as well in 5 years. You don't need to get sucked into the sports nutrition marketing that tells you they have something better for you. It's not like your wheels or your TT frame. In 5 years, those probably will be a little outdated because the technology there is constantly evolving. Human physiology is not (well, that's another subject in itself, but it certainly isn't changing fast enough for us to tell the difference in a lifetime...).
When it comes to sports nutrition for endurance events, I firmly believe that keeping it simple is the best road to success. What does your body need while you are exercising, even for very long periods of time as in an Ironman? In order of priority, it needs water, carbohydrates, and electrolytes (primarily sodium and potassium). That's it. All of the other stuff, in my opinion, is just marketing "fluff". Your body certainly doesn't need protein (or amino acids) or fat, or vitamins, or minerals during exercise. It's in a state of shock and in no case would it ever turn to protein or fat sources of nutrition for energy over a carbohydrate. Your body's primary goal, above all else, is to get glucose (the simplest carbohydrate) to your brain, your heart, and all the muscles of your body as fast as possible. Anything else in your stomach besides carbohydrates is, in many cases, going to promote gastrointestinal distress during exercise. Now you certainly need all that other stuff after exercise for recovery, and how you choose to accomplish that is completely up to you, but again, I would tend to promote a well-balanced diet over mixing up designer recovery shakes.
So how does one get glucose into the body as fast as possible during exercise? Well, I've been a fairly outspoken advocate of plain maltodextrin on internet forums like slowtwitch.com, and I won't delve completely into the subject now, but I will briefly explain why maltodextrin is a good option. Cyclists have realized for many years that plain maltodextrin works well for supplying glucose to the body during exercise. Maltodextrin is a synthetic polymer of glucose linked in chains of about 10-20. The great thing about maltodextrin is that it is absorbed from the gut as glucose nearly identically as fast as plain old, raw glucose. But, the fact that it is a larger molecule means you can make very concentrated solutions of maltodextrin and avoid making them extremely hypertonic to human plasma. One common misconception that I think is worth mentioning, is the idea that is often thrown around that you want "extended release" (or low glycemic index) carbohydrates during exercise. This is simply not true. In theory, you would want the "fastest release" (or highest glycemic index) carbohydrate as possible all the time. Like I said, the primary goal is to deliver a constant supply of glucose to your body as fast as possible. Glucose then, would theoretically be the best fuel. But as I have already mentioned, the problem with glucose is that concentrated solutions of it are very hypertonic and simply not practical for use during exercise. Thus, maltodextrin is the next best option. The other great thing about maltodextrin, is that it's pretty much dirt cheap. Commercially, it's used in beer distillation, so you can typically buy it in bulk from a beer supply store for less than $2.00 per pound.
Now, for my review and comparison of plain maltodextrin with one of the leading "designer" products out there, Infinit nutrition. I would like to thank Michael, at Infinit nutrition, who generously provided me with a bag of custom product to try.
Carbohydrate source
Plain maltodextrin is exactly what it sounds like: plain maltodextrin. It's an excellent source of carbohydrates for reasons that I explained above. It's simple and it works.
Infinit nutrition has a mixture of 3 different carbohydrates: maltodextrin, dextrose (aka. glucose), and sucrose. The maltodextrin obviously makes sense to me, but I am slightly confused to see glucose on the ingredients list. I'm not sure what it really adds. The maltodextrin will be absorbed just as fast as raw glucose, so I'm not sure why I would need to also include glucose in my nutrition. The only thing I can see it doing is creating potential for a very hypertonic solution when making a concentrated bottle, which tends to upset my stomach. The last carbohydrate, sucrose, is a dissacharide of one glucose molecule bound to a fructose molecule. Sucrose is broken down to glucose and fructose very rapidly in the stomach before it is absorbed, so again, the sucrose is adding more raw glucose to the mix. Not needed in my opinion. Moreover, fructose is a completely different monosaccharide from glucose altogether. It has it's own different receptors for absorption in the gut and is processed in the liver to make ATP (energy), which can then be shuttled to the brain and muscles. It is not as good of an energy source as glucose, which can be processed directly in the muscles. In my opinion, fructose (via sucrose) is not needed in the mixture and actually undesirable. It is often a major culprit in gastrointestinal distress during exercise. I have talked with Michael at Infinit nutriton about this, and as I understand, the reason that they add sucrose is because of some data in the literature that shows an increased carbohydrate oxidation when ingesting a mixture of glucose plus sucrose vs. plain glucose (or maltodextrin) alone. The carbohydrate oxidation is reported as being increased from ~1 g/min to ~1.25 g/min. What does this mean? It potentially means that your body could absorb about 5 kcal per minute of carbohydrate with a glucose/sucrose mixture instead of just 4 kcal per minute with glucose (or maltodextrin) alone. Over the course of an hour, this would theoretically be taking in about 300 kcal instead of 240 kcal. The key thing to understand however, is that this data is reported as increased carbohydrate oxidation, not increased glucose oxidation. The 0.25 g/min increased oxidation that they report is due to fructose oxidation, because there is fructose in the mixture via sucrose, and fructose has a different pathway for metabolism than glucose, as I have already mentioned. This fructose oxidation, in my opinion, is irrelevant and not useful during exercise. There are no performance gains to be had here. I have not seen a paper (and I don't think that I will), that reports any increased glucose oxidation over 1 g/min. If anybody has one, please send it to me.
The winner of this category: plain maltodextrin
Ease of use
Plain maltodextrin is pretty darn easy to use. It comes in powder form and it contains 4 kcal per gram. So, just figure out how many kcal you want to ingest per hour, and mix up a bottle. I have no problem concentrating a single bottle up to 5 hours. It mixes best in slighlty warm water, which can then be chilled after it is all in suspension. The major downside to plain maltodextrin however, is that it is just pure carbohydrates. It lacks one of the key three components that I mentioned are necessary in endurance exercise: electrolytes. Thus, you have to supplement electrolytes somehow. I choose to supplement them by taking Salt Stick caps. Salt Sticks are primarily sodium and potassium (which is all you need, in my opinion), but they also have a little bit of vitamin D, calcium, magnesium, and chloride. I like them because they are relatively cheap and easy to swallow. The major downside is that I have to carry a pill box. I have tried to break open the caps and mix them in my maltodextrin mixture, but it always ends up tasting way too salty and is not palletable for me.
The big seller about Infinit nutrition is that it is completely customizable. Their online system is pretty cool. You can choose levels for flavor, carbohydrate blend, calories, electrolyte blend, protein, amino acid blend, and caffeine. They put it all in one mixture for you and tell you to take 2 scoops per hour. All you have to do is mix it up and you're good to go. You need absolutely nothing else besides plain water. Michael told me I would be amazed when I saw how easily this stuff mixes into solution, and I must say, I really am. He told me that they buy some really top-shelf ingredients to produce the Infinit, and I believe him. It really just takes a few motions turning to bottle over back-and-forth to mix up even a 3-4 hour bottle. You hardly even have to shake it. No messing with warm water and then chilling it. Cold water works just fine. The only downside I can see to mixing this stuff up is that since there is protein in the powder, it foams when shaken. This is unavoidable for any mixture that contains protein, but kind of annoying in my opinion. Since I don't think that I really need the protein, I'd probably consider just leaving it out altogether. The foam can make it difficult to top off the bottle with water, or it can make it difficult out on the road to see how much solution you actually have left in your bottle and how much is just foam. Really just a minor annoyance, but something to think about.
The winner of this category: Infinit nutrition
Cost
Like I said, plain maltodextrin is dirt cheap. I buy it for $2.00 per lb at City Beverage in Winston-Salem, NC. I could get it even cheaper if I wanted to buy it in quantities greater than 5 lb at a time. The only other cost to consider in fueling with maltodextrin alone are the Salt Sticks. A bottle of 100 caps costs $20.00. A one hour serving of maltodextrin for me is 75 g, so I can get about 6 servings out of a 1 lb bag, making it about $0.33 per serving. I generally take about 2 Salt Sticks per hour, so if I add in $0.40 for the two Salt Sticks, a one hour serving of maltodextrin plus Salt Sticks cost about $0.73. If I think about it in terms of a 5 hour bike ride, that costs me about $3.65.
Infinit nutrition is pricey. My invoice says that a 25 serving bag (take one serving per hour) costs $42.95 plus $10.53 for shipping, making this product $2.14 per serving. For my 5 hour bike ride, that costs me $10.70.
The winner of this category: plain maltodextrin. Personally, I can't justify spending ~$10 on my nutrition for every long training ride. That cost can really add up over a season training for an Ironman.
Overall satisfaction
There's nothing fancy about drinking plain maltodextrin. It's essentially flavorless, and it gets pretty syrupy when heavily concentrated. Taking the last swig of warm maltodextrin syrup 5 hours into a bike ride isn't necessarily fun. On the other hand, it has NEVER caused me any gastrointestinal upset. It's plain and simple, and my body knows how to use it. It gives me the calories my body needs and I finish my rides feeling strong and ready to run. I ocassionally will mess around with adding a little bit of flavor to my maltodextrin mixture by mixing in a scoop of Crystal Light or Gatorade powder, just to give it a little bit of flavor and I think this helps a bit. I do get tired of popping Salt Stick caps though and have often wished to find a convenient way to add electrolytes to my maltodextrin mixture.
I will say this, you get what you pay for with Infinit nutrition. It's a designer product and it certainly works like one. The taste is great. You can select anything from a mild to strong flavor depending on your preferance. I chose the orange flavor and I've been happy with it (they also have lemon-lime and fruit punch). Even at the very end of a ride, I have pulled into the garage with my bike and willingly taken the last swig of Infinit nutrition out of my bottle. That says a lot, that I still have a desire to drink it at the end of 5 hours! Also, for the amount of sodium that this product has in it (I chose a sodium content per serving that was about equivalent to that of 2 Salt Sticks), you certainly can't taste it. It doesn't taste anything like when I try to mix my Salt Sticks into my maltodextrin. I don't know how they hide the saltiness, but I certainly don't notice it. Overall, I feel that the Infinit has worked just as well as my maltodextrin mixture for providing me energy during the ride. The first couple of times I used it though, I did have a little bit of gastrointestinal upset. I felt like my stomach was kind of "sloshing" around towards the end of my ride and I didn't feel quite like myself at the beginning of my run. By my third time using it for a long ride, that feeling had completely gone away. It seems that for me, there was a bit of an "adaption period". The only thing slightly different feeling about the Infinint, is that stragely, it makes be burp during the ride. It's not super often; maybe once every hour, but it's there and I'm not completely sure why. I never burp with maltodextrin mixtures. I think it might be the protein. Either way, it's not really a big invonvenience (for me at least). And finally, I'll admit that I was a little bit skeptical when Michael at Infinit nutrition told me to keep just a tad bit of protein in my custom Infinit mix because it helps to ward off hunger on long rides. I've never noticed any gnawing hunger pains during my long rides with plain maltodextrin, but generally, I am rather hungry when I get in the house after a long ride or a long brick and I sometimes have the urge to eat everything in the cuboard. After workouts using Infinit, this post-workout hunger is definitely minimized a degree and I'm generally pretty satisfied when I walk in the door. So even if protein doesn't help during the actual exercise, I suppose if you can tolerate a little bit of it, you might help to minimize some post-workout hunger.
The winner of this category: Infinit nutrition
So, it appears that I've established a "tie" between my plain maltodextrin and Infinit nutrition. So what does this mean for my training and racing? Well, I can't justify the cost of the Infinit nutrition for everyday training since my maltodextrin works just fine. So I will continue to use plain maltodextrin for long training workouts. On the other hand, for races lasting several hours or more, the convenience and ease of use of Infinit nutrition seems worth it to me. A 25 serving bag will last me a decent while if I save it just for races, and maybe a couple of pre-race workouts to get my stomach "ready" for it. I plan to use Infinit nutrition in my upcoming 140.6 (Rev3 Cedar Point).
When it comes to sports nutrition for endurance events, I firmly believe that keeping it simple is the best road to success. What does your body need while you are exercising, even for very long periods of time as in an Ironman? In order of priority, it needs water, carbohydrates, and electrolytes (primarily sodium and potassium). That's it. All of the other stuff, in my opinion, is just marketing "fluff". Your body certainly doesn't need protein (or amino acids) or fat, or vitamins, or minerals during exercise. It's in a state of shock and in no case would it ever turn to protein or fat sources of nutrition for energy over a carbohydrate. Your body's primary goal, above all else, is to get glucose (the simplest carbohydrate) to your brain, your heart, and all the muscles of your body as fast as possible. Anything else in your stomach besides carbohydrates is, in many cases, going to promote gastrointestinal distress during exercise. Now you certainly need all that other stuff after exercise for recovery, and how you choose to accomplish that is completely up to you, but again, I would tend to promote a well-balanced diet over mixing up designer recovery shakes.
So how does one get glucose into the body as fast as possible during exercise? Well, I've been a fairly outspoken advocate of plain maltodextrin on internet forums like slowtwitch.com, and I won't delve completely into the subject now, but I will briefly explain why maltodextrin is a good option. Cyclists have realized for many years that plain maltodextrin works well for supplying glucose to the body during exercise. Maltodextrin is a synthetic polymer of glucose linked in chains of about 10-20. The great thing about maltodextrin is that it is absorbed from the gut as glucose nearly identically as fast as plain old, raw glucose. But, the fact that it is a larger molecule means you can make very concentrated solutions of maltodextrin and avoid making them extremely hypertonic to human plasma. One common misconception that I think is worth mentioning, is the idea that is often thrown around that you want "extended release" (or low glycemic index) carbohydrates during exercise. This is simply not true. In theory, you would want the "fastest release" (or highest glycemic index) carbohydrate as possible all the time. Like I said, the primary goal is to deliver a constant supply of glucose to your body as fast as possible. Glucose then, would theoretically be the best fuel. But as I have already mentioned, the problem with glucose is that concentrated solutions of it are very hypertonic and simply not practical for use during exercise. Thus, maltodextrin is the next best option. The other great thing about maltodextrin, is that it's pretty much dirt cheap. Commercially, it's used in beer distillation, so you can typically buy it in bulk from a beer supply store for less than $2.00 per pound.
Now, for my review and comparison of plain maltodextrin with one of the leading "designer" products out there, Infinit nutrition. I would like to thank Michael, at Infinit nutrition, who generously provided me with a bag of custom product to try.
Carbohydrate source
Plain maltodextrin is exactly what it sounds like: plain maltodextrin. It's an excellent source of carbohydrates for reasons that I explained above. It's simple and it works.
Infinit nutrition has a mixture of 3 different carbohydrates: maltodextrin, dextrose (aka. glucose), and sucrose. The maltodextrin obviously makes sense to me, but I am slightly confused to see glucose on the ingredients list. I'm not sure what it really adds. The maltodextrin will be absorbed just as fast as raw glucose, so I'm not sure why I would need to also include glucose in my nutrition. The only thing I can see it doing is creating potential for a very hypertonic solution when making a concentrated bottle, which tends to upset my stomach. The last carbohydrate, sucrose, is a dissacharide of one glucose molecule bound to a fructose molecule. Sucrose is broken down to glucose and fructose very rapidly in the stomach before it is absorbed, so again, the sucrose is adding more raw glucose to the mix. Not needed in my opinion. Moreover, fructose is a completely different monosaccharide from glucose altogether. It has it's own different receptors for absorption in the gut and is processed in the liver to make ATP (energy), which can then be shuttled to the brain and muscles. It is not as good of an energy source as glucose, which can be processed directly in the muscles. In my opinion, fructose (via sucrose) is not needed in the mixture and actually undesirable. It is often a major culprit in gastrointestinal distress during exercise. I have talked with Michael at Infinit nutriton about this, and as I understand, the reason that they add sucrose is because of some data in the literature that shows an increased carbohydrate oxidation when ingesting a mixture of glucose plus sucrose vs. plain glucose (or maltodextrin) alone. The carbohydrate oxidation is reported as being increased from ~1 g/min to ~1.25 g/min. What does this mean? It potentially means that your body could absorb about 5 kcal per minute of carbohydrate with a glucose/sucrose mixture instead of just 4 kcal per minute with glucose (or maltodextrin) alone. Over the course of an hour, this would theoretically be taking in about 300 kcal instead of 240 kcal. The key thing to understand however, is that this data is reported as increased carbohydrate oxidation, not increased glucose oxidation. The 0.25 g/min increased oxidation that they report is due to fructose oxidation, because there is fructose in the mixture via sucrose, and fructose has a different pathway for metabolism than glucose, as I have already mentioned. This fructose oxidation, in my opinion, is irrelevant and not useful during exercise. There are no performance gains to be had here. I have not seen a paper (and I don't think that I will), that reports any increased glucose oxidation over 1 g/min. If anybody has one, please send it to me.
The winner of this category: plain maltodextrin
Ease of use
Plain maltodextrin is pretty darn easy to use. It comes in powder form and it contains 4 kcal per gram. So, just figure out how many kcal you want to ingest per hour, and mix up a bottle. I have no problem concentrating a single bottle up to 5 hours. It mixes best in slighlty warm water, which can then be chilled after it is all in suspension. The major downside to plain maltodextrin however, is that it is just pure carbohydrates. It lacks one of the key three components that I mentioned are necessary in endurance exercise: electrolytes. Thus, you have to supplement electrolytes somehow. I choose to supplement them by taking Salt Stick caps. Salt Sticks are primarily sodium and potassium (which is all you need, in my opinion), but they also have a little bit of vitamin D, calcium, magnesium, and chloride. I like them because they are relatively cheap and easy to swallow. The major downside is that I have to carry a pill box. I have tried to break open the caps and mix them in my maltodextrin mixture, but it always ends up tasting way too salty and is not palletable for me.
The big seller about Infinit nutrition is that it is completely customizable. Their online system is pretty cool. You can choose levels for flavor, carbohydrate blend, calories, electrolyte blend, protein, amino acid blend, and caffeine. They put it all in one mixture for you and tell you to take 2 scoops per hour. All you have to do is mix it up and you're good to go. You need absolutely nothing else besides plain water. Michael told me I would be amazed when I saw how easily this stuff mixes into solution, and I must say, I really am. He told me that they buy some really top-shelf ingredients to produce the Infinit, and I believe him. It really just takes a few motions turning to bottle over back-and-forth to mix up even a 3-4 hour bottle. You hardly even have to shake it. No messing with warm water and then chilling it. Cold water works just fine. The only downside I can see to mixing this stuff up is that since there is protein in the powder, it foams when shaken. This is unavoidable for any mixture that contains protein, but kind of annoying in my opinion. Since I don't think that I really need the protein, I'd probably consider just leaving it out altogether. The foam can make it difficult to top off the bottle with water, or it can make it difficult out on the road to see how much solution you actually have left in your bottle and how much is just foam. Really just a minor annoyance, but something to think about.
The winner of this category: Infinit nutrition
Cost
Like I said, plain maltodextrin is dirt cheap. I buy it for $2.00 per lb at City Beverage in Winston-Salem, NC. I could get it even cheaper if I wanted to buy it in quantities greater than 5 lb at a time. The only other cost to consider in fueling with maltodextrin alone are the Salt Sticks. A bottle of 100 caps costs $20.00. A one hour serving of maltodextrin for me is 75 g, so I can get about 6 servings out of a 1 lb bag, making it about $0.33 per serving. I generally take about 2 Salt Sticks per hour, so if I add in $0.40 for the two Salt Sticks, a one hour serving of maltodextrin plus Salt Sticks cost about $0.73. If I think about it in terms of a 5 hour bike ride, that costs me about $3.65.
Infinit nutrition is pricey. My invoice says that a 25 serving bag (take one serving per hour) costs $42.95 plus $10.53 for shipping, making this product $2.14 per serving. For my 5 hour bike ride, that costs me $10.70.
The winner of this category: plain maltodextrin. Personally, I can't justify spending ~$10 on my nutrition for every long training ride. That cost can really add up over a season training for an Ironman.
Overall satisfaction
There's nothing fancy about drinking plain maltodextrin. It's essentially flavorless, and it gets pretty syrupy when heavily concentrated. Taking the last swig of warm maltodextrin syrup 5 hours into a bike ride isn't necessarily fun. On the other hand, it has NEVER caused me any gastrointestinal upset. It's plain and simple, and my body knows how to use it. It gives me the calories my body needs and I finish my rides feeling strong and ready to run. I ocassionally will mess around with adding a little bit of flavor to my maltodextrin mixture by mixing in a scoop of Crystal Light or Gatorade powder, just to give it a little bit of flavor and I think this helps a bit. I do get tired of popping Salt Stick caps though and have often wished to find a convenient way to add electrolytes to my maltodextrin mixture.
I will say this, you get what you pay for with Infinit nutrition. It's a designer product and it certainly works like one. The taste is great. You can select anything from a mild to strong flavor depending on your preferance. I chose the orange flavor and I've been happy with it (they also have lemon-lime and fruit punch). Even at the very end of a ride, I have pulled into the garage with my bike and willingly taken the last swig of Infinit nutrition out of my bottle. That says a lot, that I still have a desire to drink it at the end of 5 hours! Also, for the amount of sodium that this product has in it (I chose a sodium content per serving that was about equivalent to that of 2 Salt Sticks), you certainly can't taste it. It doesn't taste anything like when I try to mix my Salt Sticks into my maltodextrin. I don't know how they hide the saltiness, but I certainly don't notice it. Overall, I feel that the Infinit has worked just as well as my maltodextrin mixture for providing me energy during the ride. The first couple of times I used it though, I did have a little bit of gastrointestinal upset. I felt like my stomach was kind of "sloshing" around towards the end of my ride and I didn't feel quite like myself at the beginning of my run. By my third time using it for a long ride, that feeling had completely gone away. It seems that for me, there was a bit of an "adaption period". The only thing slightly different feeling about the Infinint, is that stragely, it makes be burp during the ride. It's not super often; maybe once every hour, but it's there and I'm not completely sure why. I never burp with maltodextrin mixtures. I think it might be the protein. Either way, it's not really a big invonvenience (for me at least). And finally, I'll admit that I was a little bit skeptical when Michael at Infinit nutrition told me to keep just a tad bit of protein in my custom Infinit mix because it helps to ward off hunger on long rides. I've never noticed any gnawing hunger pains during my long rides with plain maltodextrin, but generally, I am rather hungry when I get in the house after a long ride or a long brick and I sometimes have the urge to eat everything in the cuboard. After workouts using Infinit, this post-workout hunger is definitely minimized a degree and I'm generally pretty satisfied when I walk in the door. So even if protein doesn't help during the actual exercise, I suppose if you can tolerate a little bit of it, you might help to minimize some post-workout hunger.
The winner of this category: Infinit nutrition
So, it appears that I've established a "tie" between my plain maltodextrin and Infinit nutrition. So what does this mean for my training and racing? Well, I can't justify the cost of the Infinit nutrition for everyday training since my maltodextrin works just fine. So I will continue to use plain maltodextrin for long training workouts. On the other hand, for races lasting several hours or more, the convenience and ease of use of Infinit nutrition seems worth it to me. A 25 serving bag will last me a decent while if I save it just for races, and maybe a couple of pre-race workouts to get my stomach "ready" for it. I plan to use Infinit nutrition in my upcoming 140.6 (Rev3 Cedar Point).
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Race Report: Valdese Sprint Triathlon
Yesterday was the Valdese Sprint Triathlon. This tri will always be one of my favorites because it was actually my very first triathlon ever. It's hard to believe that it was just three short years ago that I was racing on my mountain bike with a helmet that I had borrowed from a friend! I've certainly gotten a little bit more serious about my equipment choices since then! But anyway, I'm glad that I got the chance to race it again for my third consecutive year. This date, June 25th, was actually a rescheduled date because the original April 16th event was cancelled due to incliment weather.
Overall, the race went really well. I approached the race as a training session, and therefore didn't taper at all leading up to it. My major goal is Rev3 Cedar Point in September and these sprint races are really just a fun way to get in some brick work. I still completed my hard VO2 max session on the bike on Thursday night and my tempo run on Friday, and also not to mention the HARD time trial up Pilot Mountain on Tuesday, so when I woke up yesterday morning I definitely didn't have the usual race-day "snap" in my legs. But, I ended up with a solid 3rd place finish overall and 1st in the M 25-29 age group. I only missed 1st place overall by 60 seconds, so I can't complain about that. This is how it all broke down:
Swim (250 yd): 4:27, 38th overall.
This is actually a very solid swim split for me. My swim still lags FAR behind my bike and my run because I just haven't found the time to spend really working on my stroke with an instructor, but I'm pleased with swimming significantly under 2:00/100 yd (my planned IM swim pace). I didn't push it too hard on the swim and felt very comfortable coming out of the water.
Bike (9 mi): 25:33, 2nd overall.
In the back of my mind, my major goal for this race had been to post the fastest bike split of the day, so I am a little bummed that I only posted 2nd fastest by 16 seconds. The bike course at Valdese is pretty hilly and technical, with a lot of climbs out of the aerobars, and I realized pretty early on in the bike leg, that my legs were paying for the hard week of training leading up to this race, so I had to dial down the intensity a bit from my planned 320 W. I ended up averaging 290 W, which is a significant under-performance for me at that distance, but I am still happy that it managed to snag me the 2nd fastest bike split.
Run (3.1 mi): 18:57, 4th overall.
I really had NO idea what to expect for this 5 km run because I have been doing a lot of longer run sessions lately for Rev3 and have put less emphasis on the speedwork. I started off the first mile pretty conservatively and was suprised with how good I felt. As I rounded the 1.5 mile turn around cone, I really picked up the pace and finished very strong over the second half of the race. Honestly, this is probably the best I have felt finishing a 5 km run in a LONG time and I feel good about the run training that I'm doing for Rev3.
Thanks to SetUp Events and the town of Valdese for putting on a great race yesterday. I'll definitely have this one on the calendar for next year!
Overall, the race went really well. I approached the race as a training session, and therefore didn't taper at all leading up to it. My major goal is Rev3 Cedar Point in September and these sprint races are really just a fun way to get in some brick work. I still completed my hard VO2 max session on the bike on Thursday night and my tempo run on Friday, and also not to mention the HARD time trial up Pilot Mountain on Tuesday, so when I woke up yesterday morning I definitely didn't have the usual race-day "snap" in my legs. But, I ended up with a solid 3rd place finish overall and 1st in the M 25-29 age group. I only missed 1st place overall by 60 seconds, so I can't complain about that. This is how it all broke down:
Swim (250 yd): 4:27, 38th overall.
This is actually a very solid swim split for me. My swim still lags FAR behind my bike and my run because I just haven't found the time to spend really working on my stroke with an instructor, but I'm pleased with swimming significantly under 2:00/100 yd (my planned IM swim pace). I didn't push it too hard on the swim and felt very comfortable coming out of the water.
Bike (9 mi): 25:33, 2nd overall.
In the back of my mind, my major goal for this race had been to post the fastest bike split of the day, so I am a little bummed that I only posted 2nd fastest by 16 seconds. The bike course at Valdese is pretty hilly and technical, with a lot of climbs out of the aerobars, and I realized pretty early on in the bike leg, that my legs were paying for the hard week of training leading up to this race, so I had to dial down the intensity a bit from my planned 320 W. I ended up averaging 290 W, which is a significant under-performance for me at that distance, but I am still happy that it managed to snag me the 2nd fastest bike split.
Run (3.1 mi): 18:57, 4th overall.
I really had NO idea what to expect for this 5 km run because I have been doing a lot of longer run sessions lately for Rev3 and have put less emphasis on the speedwork. I started off the first mile pretty conservatively and was suprised with how good I felt. As I rounded the 1.5 mile turn around cone, I really picked up the pace and finished very strong over the second half of the race. Honestly, this is probably the best I have felt finishing a 5 km run in a LONG time and I feel good about the run training that I'm doing for Rev3.
Thanks to SetUp Events and the town of Valdese for putting on a great race yesterday. I'll definitely have this one on the calendar for next year!
Friday, June 24, 2011
Back in the Saddle!
It's been quite a while since I've had time to post, but I am happy to announce - as said best by Aerosmith - that "I'm back in the saddle again!" The past couple of months have been extremely busy for me. I completed my final two surgical rotations in orthopaedics at Wake Forest, and wanted to leave the department with a good impression, so I tried my best to work as hard as possible during the 8 weeks. Overall it was a fantastic experience and left me completely certain that I made the right choice in deciding to pursue orthopaedic surgery as my future vocation, but it left me with little time for other things like posting on this blog!
I did manage to get some solid training accomplished in my garage (AKA the "pain cave") on the trainer and the treadmill, despite being rather busy, and I feel that I have made some solid gains on both the bike and the run. My training has really started to "ramp up" lately as I am making the solid march toward Rev3 Cedar Point on September 11th. My approach to training for this (my first) iron-distance even has been relatively high(er) intensity and low(er) volume than most programs out there, so it has been very challenging mentally to get "psyched up" for hard interval sessions on the trainer or the treadmill multiple times per week, but my body feels great. The fitness gains have definitely been substantial and I feel fast. I just need to really listen to my body over these next weeks prior to Rev3 and stay healthy!
I made my return to racing this week on Tuesday night at the "grand finale" of the Mock Orange Bikes MoSpeed TT series. The final race was held at Pilot Mountain, just about 25 miles north of Winston-Salem. Pilot Mountain is one of the best climbs in Piedmont Triad area of North Carolina and gains approximately 1400 feet of elevation in 2.26 miles (average 11.7% grade). The time trial was simply from the base of the mountain to the parking lot at the summit. Only 2.26 miles...easy, right? I knew that I would be at a slight disadvantage in a mountain time trial as compared to the other races in the series, which have been flat time trials, because as cyclists go, I am on the larger size (80 kg), but nonetheless, I knew it would be a fantastic substitute for my normal Tuesday night lactate threshold workout on the trainer and a good chance to set some new mean maximal power (MMP) records.
In the end, I am very pleased with how I performed. I finished 3rd in the B Category, which was good enough for 9th overall. My total time was 16:10 and my average power was 355 W (4.4 W/kg). I think I paced the race well and I am very pleased with my average power. Sustaining a power output much over 4 W/kg for intervals lasting greater than 15 minutes has been a major barrier for me, and I feel like I finally completely obliterated it! I ended up setting new MMP's for 15, 10, 5, and 4 minutes. My new 4 minute MMP was set during my last 4 minutes of the race, so I was very pleased with my final "kick".
Tomorrow morning is the re-scheduled Valdese Sprint Triathlon. 250 yd swim, 9 mile bike, and 5k run. I haven't really been focusing on short-course racing lately, but I'm hoping I can really nail the short bike leg at a high power output and have a solid run! I'll post a race report when I get the results back.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Race Report: Dixie Classic Criterium Series Race 3 of 8 (FIRST CRIT EVER!)
After getting my first taste of a real cycling road race a few weeks ago at the Wake Forest University Cycling ACC Road Race, I've really had the urge to try out another road race to redeem myself from what I feel was a sub-par performance on my part. I've had a little more free time in my schedule this week as I am finishing out the last week of my 3rd year of medical school on a somewhat easier rotation (Radiology), so I was perusing a few of the LBS websites last night to see what kind of local road racing I could find. I didn't find a whole lot in terms of road racing, but I realized that there is a great criterium series held right here in Winston-Salem on the Dixie Classic Fairgrounds. Granted, I ride my road bike a heck of a lot, but to be completely honest, I am very far removed from the typical "roadie", so I hardly even knew what a criterium was. I did a little bit of searching on the internet and quickly convinced myself that this race sounded like a good idea. It sounded fast, intense, and full of white-knuckled turns; everything that my current ironman training schedule is NOT preparing me for! I knew it would be a great way to get some really hard lactate threshold and VO2 max work in though, as well as expose me to more of the world of cycling. So I figured, what the heck, and decided to register.
I rode out to the fairgrounds after getting off work to get an easy 5 mi warmup in. The temperature was a hot 83 degrees with a strong wind from the southwest. I picked up my number at the registration table and continued my warmup out on the race course. Overall, it seemed like a really great course. It was completely contained within the fairgrounds, so obviously closed to traffic. The loop was a 0.6 mi oval with 2 major turns at either end and a large s-bend along one of the straights. After riding a dozen or so laps, I felt like a had a good feel for the lines I needed to follow through the turns.
As I made my way to the starting line, I thought about what my strategy for this race should be. I knew that I didn't want to spend time hanging out in an easy peleton, like I did in the WFU Cycling ACC Road Race, so I figured I would control the pace on this 30 min criterium and try my best to take the snap out of the sprinter's legs so I would be in a position to podium at the finish. When the gun went off, I dropped the hammer. I sprinted to the first turn and never looked back. For the first 15 mins of the race I rode over 350 W and lapped all but 4 racers in the field of about 20. I then dialed it down to about 320 W and continued to push. After a few more laps, I realized that the group of 4 riders who I hadn't lapped were working together to slowly reel me in. With over 10 mins to go in the race and a very strong wind along the back stretch of the loop, I knew that they would be able to pull me in if they worked together, so I eased off the gas and decided that I would hang back and recover for a couple of minutes. When the 4 riders overtook me, I realized that we were settling into a nice easy pace, which was not at all beneficial to me. I felt like the only way I had a shot at winning this thing was to make sure that everybody was completely drained by the finish so I wouldn't get out-sprinted. I knew I still had the legs to hammer out the rest of the race at approximately 320-ish W, but I decided to hang back for a few minutes and see if anybody would make a surge. Nobody did. So, I took the lead again just as the officials announced 10 laps to go in the race. I surged hard for a lap and dropped 2 guys off the back of the group for good. Now it was just the 3 of us. I let up for a moment to see if one of the other guys would pull a few laps, but nobody seemed willing to go. I didn't want to let the other 2 guys who I had dropped catch back up, so I surged again. I held the lead for the rest of the race and tried as hard as I could to drop the last 2 guys, but they were sucking my wheel too efficiently. I had enough juice left to surge the last lap at over 400 W, but as I had feared, I got out-sprinted in the last straight by just a couple of wheel lengths and crossed the line in 3rd place.
Overall, I'm very happy with my first crit. I definitely felt like I used my strengths more in this race than I had in the WFU Cycling ACC Road Race, but I think I may have swung the strategic pendulum just a little too far in the opposite direction this time. Instead of sitting back in the peleton like I did in the road race, I pulled for 95% of the entire crit. This strategy did give me an excellent workout, but it left me with much less of a reserve for a super strong finish. I think that if I can find a happy medium somewhere between the two strategies, where I can control a fast pace to weaken the sprinters but still find good opportunities to get out of the wind, I will really find my "sweet spot".
I rode out to the fairgrounds after getting off work to get an easy 5 mi warmup in. The temperature was a hot 83 degrees with a strong wind from the southwest. I picked up my number at the registration table and continued my warmup out on the race course. Overall, it seemed like a really great course. It was completely contained within the fairgrounds, so obviously closed to traffic. The loop was a 0.6 mi oval with 2 major turns at either end and a large s-bend along one of the straights. After riding a dozen or so laps, I felt like a had a good feel for the lines I needed to follow through the turns.
As I made my way to the starting line, I thought about what my strategy for this race should be. I knew that I didn't want to spend time hanging out in an easy peleton, like I did in the WFU Cycling ACC Road Race, so I figured I would control the pace on this 30 min criterium and try my best to take the snap out of the sprinter's legs so I would be in a position to podium at the finish. When the gun went off, I dropped the hammer. I sprinted to the first turn and never looked back. For the first 15 mins of the race I rode over 350 W and lapped all but 4 racers in the field of about 20. I then dialed it down to about 320 W and continued to push. After a few more laps, I realized that the group of 4 riders who I hadn't lapped were working together to slowly reel me in. With over 10 mins to go in the race and a very strong wind along the back stretch of the loop, I knew that they would be able to pull me in if they worked together, so I eased off the gas and decided that I would hang back and recover for a couple of minutes. When the 4 riders overtook me, I realized that we were settling into a nice easy pace, which was not at all beneficial to me. I felt like the only way I had a shot at winning this thing was to make sure that everybody was completely drained by the finish so I wouldn't get out-sprinted. I knew I still had the legs to hammer out the rest of the race at approximately 320-ish W, but I decided to hang back for a few minutes and see if anybody would make a surge. Nobody did. So, I took the lead again just as the officials announced 10 laps to go in the race. I surged hard for a lap and dropped 2 guys off the back of the group for good. Now it was just the 3 of us. I let up for a moment to see if one of the other guys would pull a few laps, but nobody seemed willing to go. I didn't want to let the other 2 guys who I had dropped catch back up, so I surged again. I held the lead for the rest of the race and tried as hard as I could to drop the last 2 guys, but they were sucking my wheel too efficiently. I had enough juice left to surge the last lap at over 400 W, but as I had feared, I got out-sprinted in the last straight by just a couple of wheel lengths and crossed the line in 3rd place.
Overall, I'm very happy with my first crit. I definitely felt like I used my strengths more in this race than I had in the WFU Cycling ACC Road Race, but I think I may have swung the strategic pendulum just a little too far in the opposite direction this time. Instead of sitting back in the peleton like I did in the road race, I pulled for 95% of the entire crit. This strategy did give me an excellent workout, but it left me with much less of a reserve for a super strong finish. I think that if I can find a happy medium somewhere between the two strategies, where I can control a fast pace to weaken the sprinters but still find good opportunities to get out of the wind, I will really find my "sweet spot".
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Valdese Tri Cancelled, Blue Ridge Parkway Instead!
Unfortunately, my first sprint tri of the season, the Valdese Triathlon, was cancelled on Saturday morning due to the heavy rain and high winds, along with a tornado watch that was in effect all day. I was pretty disappointed not to race, but also very disappointed for Jess, because I had convinced her to race in her first triathlon and she has been training hard for the past couple of months! The race is re-scheduled for June 25th.
Our plan all along had been to race in Valdese, NC and then drive the rest of the way to Asheville and spend the rest of the weekend with my sister Kate, her husband Luke, and my baby nephew Eli. My parent's were also going to be in Asheville for the weekend. So, since the race was cancelled, we ended up making it to their house in Asheville pretty early on Saturday, which was nice because we had a lot of time to visit.
I hadn't really been planning to ride at all in Asheville, because I was planning on taking a rest day after the race on Saturday, but since it was cancelled I figured I had to get a workout in somehow this weekend. Today ended up being a beautiful, sunny day with highs in the mid 60's, so I decided to ride a section of the Blue Ridge Parkway. The only thing slightly problematic, was that all I had was my tri bike and all of my aero race gear (ie. aero helmet, tri suit, 88 mm wheelset, and disc cover), so yes, I was "that guy" out on the parkway this morning! Sorry for being a sterotypical tri nerd!
I'm so glad that I got a ride in though. The Blue Ridge Parkway is an absolutely stunning place to ride. To be honest, it is probably the best road riding that I have EVER done. The pavement is in phenomenal shape, there are no side streets or intersections, and I probably saw 15-20 cars max for the 2 hours that I was out riding. I got on the parkway near Asheville, at about mile post 380, which is at about 2500 ft, and headed north to make the unrelenting 10 mile climb up to the parkway visitor's center, which is at about 5500 ft. All I have to say is, I strongly recommend against riding this particular section of the parkway with an 11-23 TT cassette! Hah! But, it sure was a fantastic workout; I had to ride the whole time at about 300 W just to keep on top of the gear! I continued past the visitor's center and rode past the Mt. Mitchell turn-off and descended down to Crab Tree Falls and finished my ride at mile post 340. The descents down the north side of Mt. Mitchell in the aero bars and full aero gear were unbelievably fast (between 40-50 mph), but very fun.
I am already making plans how to incorporate some training on the Blue Ridge Parkway into my ironman long-ride training this summer.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Race Report: MoSpeed TT Series Race 2 of 5
I got my second crack at the MoSpeed 9 mi TT out in Yadkinville, NC last night. This time I came armed with a fresh battery in my LYC and a backup battery that stays in my race bag from now on. I was released from my duties at the hospital a little bit early in the afternoon and was able to make it out to the race course by about 4:30 PM (my race start time was 6:05 PM). I was excited to have time for a really good pre-race warmup and stretching, but the weather ended up being miserable, so I sat in my car for almost 30 minutes while it poured buckets. The rain finally let up by about 5:00 PM so I headed out on the race course to ride a lap for warmup. At the end of my first lap on the course, I felt so good, that I decided to do another lap to really warm my legs up since it was pretty chilly. I think this ended up being a smart decision. I finished my second warmup lap on the course just a few minutes before 6:00 PM, so by the time I was back to the starting line, it was already time to line up for my race. I felt great; my legs were loose and warm.
At 6:05 PM, they blew the whistle for my start time and I headed out on the course. I surged the first 2-3 minutes of the race at about 400 W to get up to speed and then settled in to my planned power output for the race, 320 W (108% current FTP). I chose 320 W because it was a nice even number and it seemed manageable because my previous PR power output for 20 minutes (in a non-race situation) was 315 W. I realized with my power meter this week, even more than 2 weeks ago, that the course has a lot of long undulating inclines. Rather than riding right at 320 W on the nose, I found that I was riding more at 340-350 W in the flats and inclines 290-300 W on the declines. I was running a 12-23 cassete and I definitely missed having an 11T in the gearing. My legs tend to fatigue pretty fast when I spin much above 95 rpm and I was finding my cadence creeping up into the 100's on some of the shallow declines. Overall though, I am really happy with my pacing. I was able to finish strong and rode at >400 W after passing the "1 km to go" mark in the road. I crossed the finish line in 22:00 flat (average 319 W and 24.5 mph), which although it was 36 seconds faster than race #1, was still only good enough for 7th place (interestingly, the same 6 guys who beat me last race all dropped about 30 seconds and beat me last night...I think it was probably the cool weather). But hey, I can't complain. It's a pretty stacked field of cyclists, including overall winner Chris Monteleone of Kenda Racing (runner-up in U23 road race nationals a couple of years ago). Any night that I only lose by 90 seconds to a guy like that is sucessful in my mind.
In reviewing my power file and heart rate, as well as my perceived exertion, I think that I can still drop some significant time off this 9 mi TT. Now that I know I can't ride much over 300 W on the declines with my current gearing setup, I think I will plan to ride at a higher wattage on the flats and inclines, to bring my overall average watts closer to the 330-340 range.
At 6:05 PM, they blew the whistle for my start time and I headed out on the course. I surged the first 2-3 minutes of the race at about 400 W to get up to speed and then settled in to my planned power output for the race, 320 W (108% current FTP). I chose 320 W because it was a nice even number and it seemed manageable because my previous PR power output for 20 minutes (in a non-race situation) was 315 W. I realized with my power meter this week, even more than 2 weeks ago, that the course has a lot of long undulating inclines. Rather than riding right at 320 W on the nose, I found that I was riding more at 340-350 W in the flats and inclines 290-300 W on the declines. I was running a 12-23 cassete and I definitely missed having an 11T in the gearing. My legs tend to fatigue pretty fast when I spin much above 95 rpm and I was finding my cadence creeping up into the 100's on some of the shallow declines. Overall though, I am really happy with my pacing. I was able to finish strong and rode at >400 W after passing the "1 km to go" mark in the road. I crossed the finish line in 22:00 flat (average 319 W and 24.5 mph), which although it was 36 seconds faster than race #1, was still only good enough for 7th place (interestingly, the same 6 guys who beat me last race all dropped about 30 seconds and beat me last night...I think it was probably the cool weather). But hey, I can't complain. It's a pretty stacked field of cyclists, including overall winner Chris Monteleone of Kenda Racing (runner-up in U23 road race nationals a couple of years ago). Any night that I only lose by 90 seconds to a guy like that is sucessful in my mind.
In reviewing my power file and heart rate, as well as my perceived exertion, I think that I can still drop some significant time off this 9 mi TT. Now that I know I can't ride much over 300 W on the declines with my current gearing setup, I think I will plan to ride at a higher wattage on the flats and inclines, to bring my overall average watts closer to the 330-340 range.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Most Recent Tire Rolling Resistance (CRR) Data
If you're a bike tech junkie like me, then this might come as breaking news! Bike Tech Review forum member Al Morrison has just released an updated version of his highly acclaimed tire crr chart (revision 9 was released on 03/20/11).
I STRONGLY recommend taking a look at this table when selecting your race tires. Tires are the easiest place to pick up some cheap and free speed and a component on the bike that is often overlooked. For example, when comparing the Specialized Mondo Open Tubular tire (the lowest crr for a clincher tire) and compare it to the Michelin Pro 3 Race (a tire that is widely, albeit wrongfully, considered a "fast tire"), one can save a whopping 3.6 watts per tire or 7.2 watts for the pair!! That is a heck of a lot of free wattage to be gained! Also, take special note of the comparison between latex and butyl tubes. Again, this is a no brainer in my opinion. Pick the latex tube for racing (if you race clinchers). It will always be faster and only cost $5-10 more per tube.
I STRONGLY recommend taking a look at this table when selecting your race tires. Tires are the easiest place to pick up some cheap and free speed and a component on the bike that is often overlooked. For example, when comparing the Specialized Mondo Open Tubular tire (the lowest crr for a clincher tire) and compare it to the Michelin Pro 3 Race (a tire that is widely, albeit wrongfully, considered a "fast tire"), one can save a whopping 3.6 watts per tire or 7.2 watts for the pair!! That is a heck of a lot of free wattage to be gained! Also, take special note of the comparison between latex and butyl tubes. Again, this is a no brainer in my opinion. Pick the latex tube for racing (if you race clinchers). It will always be faster and only cost $5-10 more per tube.
Race Report: MoSpeed TT Series Race 1 of 5
Last night I kicked off the spring time trial season with a 15 km race out in Lewisville, NC. One of the local bike shops, Mock Orange Bikes, is hosting a bi-weekly TT series on Tuesday nights this spring. Riders are sent off every minute on the fast out-and-back course of smooth country road.
It was a bit of a rush to get out to Lewisville and register by 6 PM (thankfully I had decided to throw my bike and gear in the back of my car before leaving for work in the morning!), but nonetheless, I made it out there with about 20 mins to get a solid warmup in. Unfortunately, during my warmup, I saw the screen on my Powertap LYC start flashing "LOBATT". Sure enough, by the time I finished my warmup and took my place in line for the race, the LYC was completely dead. I was kind of bummed because lately, I've become so dependent on my power meter for race pacing, and I really wanted see if I could nail a target of ~120% FTP for my power output. Plus, I love to look/obsess over my power file after a race and see if I can set new personal power records. But, overall I think that I still had a pretty evenly paced race. One of my bread 'n butter workouts on the trainer is 2 x 20 min intervals at 95-105% FTP, so I knew if my perceived exertion was at the upper end of how I feel on those intervals, I would be near my target power output. The only thing difficult about the course were the very long and shallow inclines/declines. Without my power meter, I typically tend to slack on the downhills when I "feel" like I'm going fast, but in reality, my power output is generally below target.
I have no clue what my true power output actually was in the race, so I have no idea how to interpret my time or speed, but I took 7th overall and scored 57 points in the series with my time of 22:36 (23.9 mph). I'm happy with the effort, considering that I've been more focused on long course endurance for the past few months rather than short course speed. I rode this TT with my "training" tires on and I've got a fresh set of Vittoria Corsa Evo CX II's in the mail that I will probably put on before one of the next races. It will be interesting to see how throwing on a tire with a much lower crr will affect my speed.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Race Report: Wake Forest University Cycling ACC Road Race
It's been a busy spring for me and I haven't had much of a chance to ride with the guys on the Wake Forest University Cycling Team this year as I had hoped, but nonetheless, they were nice enough to let me race in the home race (and my first ever cycling road race!) this Saturday out in East Bend, NC.
All in all, things went okay for my first road race. I didn't have any mechanical problems and I didn't crash in the jam-packed peloton, so I will consider that a success. But, as I run the race over in my head, I realize how much strategy there actually is to a road race. Certainly, strategy plays a much larger role in this style of race than I had given it credit.
The weather was ideal for my tastes as a racer raised in Buffalo, NY. Low 50's and overcast with a cool breeze is just about the perfect weather to really exert oneself, in my opinion. However, the rest of the ACC racers and the officials weren't on the same page, and decided to cut my race (men's C) down from 3 laps (~30 mi) to 2 laps (~20 mi) to avoid the potential rainfall on the last lap. Right off the bat, I already knew that I had lost a little bit of my advantage in the race. I was really hoping that the 3rd lap would slim down the field a little bit and give an edge to those that had a little bit bigger aerobic base. Nonetheless, the whistle blew and we started off in a "neutral start" until the first turn. I jockeyed for position amongst the peleton of ACC cyclists from about a dozen different schools, including App State, UNC, Navy, William & Mary, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Maryland, etc. After the first turn I expected somebody to make a surge and my plan was to just do what I could to hang on the back of the surging group. However, during the whole first lap, nobody really made a move. People seemed content to just hang with the peloton and let everybody get a chance at the lead. As somebody who exclusively raced time trials up to this point, it was incredibly frustrating. I was literally just coasting along at a power output that was almost 100 watts below my FTP! Had this race been a 20 mile time trial, I would have been riding the whole thing right at FTP wattage.
I'm not sure what would have been the best strategy at this point. Surely I could have gone off solo and hammered the wind myself, but the enormous peloton could have easily worked to reel me back in and overtake me eventually. But, being inexperienced as I was, I decided to hang back and just watch how things unfolded.
As we came around on our second lap of the race, nothing really changed. The pace had only picked up enough to drop a few straglers off the back and I was still hanging with the lead group of about 25 riders at a power output well below what I knew I could ride for this 20 mi race. The were 2 significant climbs on the course and as we approached the second hill on the second lap (which was only a few miles from the finish line), I realized that the lead riders were going make a surge. The riders in front of me rocketed up the hill and surged over the top. I was boxed in on the outside shoulder of the road when they made the surge and lost about 30-40 yards on the lead group before I could really make an attempt to catch up. As hard as I tried, I could not catch back up with the lead group despite several surges of 1000+ watts. At this point my legs were toast and I crossed the finish line solo in 19th place. I knew that if I had to rely on sprinting at the end of the race I would be done for. I was hoping there would be a good opportunity to hammer out the last 5-10 mins of the race and break away from some of the sprinters, but after losing the lead group, I didn't even have the chance.
It's hard to review my ride file from the race and see how low my average power was throughout most of the race and see where I lost the pack with some of those huge surges. It is incredibly different than a time trial effort! But overall, it was extremely fun and a really good learning experience. I need to read up a bit and develop a better strategy before my next road race!
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Orthotics in Cycling Shoes
I've suffered from horribly poor foot biomechanics my entire life. I have incredibly flat feet. This caused me a lot of headaches in my high school track/XC years but for the most part, was solved after I got hooked up with at fantastic sports medicine doctor at Ohio State who fitted me for some custom orthotics. I used them religiously for about 4 years (ie. I transferred them into every single pair of shoes I wore), but eventually started to get sick of them and wondered if I still really needed them. In 2008 I started to "wean" myself off of the orthotics and ran in just a regular stability running shoe. I'm not sure if the orthotics had actually corrected my biomechanics or if I just found better running shoes (since then I have run exclusively in shoes from the Asics 2100 line), but nevertheless, my lower leg and ankle issues seemed to be completely resolved.
In 2009, I started to get involved in triathlons and trained for my first half-ironman distance race in 2010. During this time, I drastically ramped up my cycling mileage and also started logging some serious time on the indoor trainer. Slowly, but surely, my old lower leg problems started to creep back into my awareness. The biggest problem for me has typically been posterior tibialis tendonitis in my left leg with some component of achilles tendonitis. During my half-iroman training, these problems weren't horrible and I still had a fantastic race, but they were still causing me some distress. I assumed, of course, that these problems were caused by my increased running mileage, so I tried to mix back in the orthotics into my running shoes, but it didn't seem to solve it.
Over this past winter, I thankfully came to the realization that the re-emergence of my lower leg problems were caused by my cycling shoes! I went through a period of several weeks where I didn't run at all and the posterior tibialis tendonitis had gotten much worse. At this point, I decided to try putting my orthotics into my cycling shoes. Immediately, I felt a huge difference in the biomechanics of my leg movement on the bike. Something just felt "better".
I have been using the orthotics in my cycling shoes for about 2 months now and have absolutely no tenonitis pain at all in my left leg. Prior to trying them out, I really didn't think that the orthotics would make any difference at all in my cycling shoes because when cycling, you don't have the typical weight bearing foot strike and pronation motion. I think that the problem was that although my cycling shoes fit very well, they didn't have any support at all in them. Even though my shoe is locked in to the pedal by my cleat, there is still an aspect of "pronation", especially under high power output. If you are blessed with poor biomechanics like me, I would highly recommend giving an orthotic insert a try in your cycling shoes.
In 2009, I started to get involved in triathlons and trained for my first half-ironman distance race in 2010. During this time, I drastically ramped up my cycling mileage and also started logging some serious time on the indoor trainer. Slowly, but surely, my old lower leg problems started to creep back into my awareness. The biggest problem for me has typically been posterior tibialis tendonitis in my left leg with some component of achilles tendonitis. During my half-iroman training, these problems weren't horrible and I still had a fantastic race, but they were still causing me some distress. I assumed, of course, that these problems were caused by my increased running mileage, so I tried to mix back in the orthotics into my running shoes, but it didn't seem to solve it.
Over this past winter, I thankfully came to the realization that the re-emergence of my lower leg problems were caused by my cycling shoes! I went through a period of several weeks where I didn't run at all and the posterior tibialis tendonitis had gotten much worse. At this point, I decided to try putting my orthotics into my cycling shoes. Immediately, I felt a huge difference in the biomechanics of my leg movement on the bike. Something just felt "better".
I have been using the orthotics in my cycling shoes for about 2 months now and have absolutely no tenonitis pain at all in my left leg. Prior to trying them out, I really didn't think that the orthotics would make any difference at all in my cycling shoes because when cycling, you don't have the typical weight bearing foot strike and pronation motion. I think that the problem was that although my cycling shoes fit very well, they didn't have any support at all in them. Even though my shoe is locked in to the pedal by my cleat, there is still an aspect of "pronation", especially under high power output. If you are blessed with poor biomechanics like me, I would highly recommend giving an orthotic insert a try in your cycling shoes.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Wheelbuilder Aerojacket
There's no question that a disc is always the fastest option in the back for time trial riding. On just about any course, except maybe the most mountainous of time trials, the aerodynamic benefits of a disc outweigh any weight penalty. However, disc wheels are quite expensive, and even more expensive if you want a disc with a Powertap built into it (which was my problem).
Fortunately, Wheelbuilder.com's Aerojacket disc cover solves this disc dilema. It's a really simple and inexpensive product ($89.95 plus shipping) and allows just about anybody to at least have the option of riding a disc. You can order online or simply call Wheelbuilder and tell them the specifications of your rear wheel (they need to know the rim and hub type) and they will cut one of the disc covers to specifically fit your wheel. The cover is lightweight plastic and will fit practically any wheel type. I know lots of people who put one of these on just a simple, cheap box rim training wheel on race day and reap all the aerodynamic benefits of an expensive disc.
I got my disc cover from Wheelbuilder in the mail earlier this week and installed it today. The cover comes with a set of 8 plastic fasteners that pass through small holes around the perimeter of the cover and hold it in place. I originally installed it using these fasteners according to the included instructions. Although this method worked pretty well, I noticed that the cover seemed to vibrate against my wheel a tiny bit as I took it for a spin around the neighborhood. In order to solve this, I used a single strip of 3M Super 33 vinyl tape and ran it around the entire circumference of the cover on either side to create a nice smooth and "clean" seal. It held so well, that I actually removed all of the fasteners, as they were not needed to hold the cover on. I then took the wheel out for a hard 25 mile ride for the true product testing. It was absolutely solid. Even with hard, out of the saddle climbs at 700+ Watts, there was no movement whatsoever of the cover. It felt as fast as the Renn 575 disc that I raced on prior to getting my Powertap. And yes, it does even make the cool "whoosh, whoosh" sound of a normal disc wheel. I really like the look of the vinyl tape to hold the cover on as opposed to the fasteners. If I were to order another Aerojacket from Wheelbuilder, I think I would actually ask them not to drill the small holes around the perimeter for the fasteners and just use tape.
Overall, I think the Wheelbuilder Aerojacket is a fantastic product. It is by far the cheapest way to get the aerodynamic benefits of riding a disc wheel.
Fortunately, Wheelbuilder.com's Aerojacket disc cover solves this disc dilema. It's a really simple and inexpensive product ($89.95 plus shipping) and allows just about anybody to at least have the option of riding a disc. You can order online or simply call Wheelbuilder and tell them the specifications of your rear wheel (they need to know the rim and hub type) and they will cut one of the disc covers to specifically fit your wheel. The cover is lightweight plastic and will fit practically any wheel type. I know lots of people who put one of these on just a simple, cheap box rim training wheel on race day and reap all the aerodynamic benefits of an expensive disc.
I got my disc cover from Wheelbuilder in the mail earlier this week and installed it today. The cover comes with a set of 8 plastic fasteners that pass through small holes around the perimeter of the cover and hold it in place. I originally installed it using these fasteners according to the included instructions. Although this method worked pretty well, I noticed that the cover seemed to vibrate against my wheel a tiny bit as I took it for a spin around the neighborhood. In order to solve this, I used a single strip of 3M Super 33 vinyl tape and ran it around the entire circumference of the cover on either side to create a nice smooth and "clean" seal. It held so well, that I actually removed all of the fasteners, as they were not needed to hold the cover on. I then took the wheel out for a hard 25 mile ride for the true product testing. It was absolutely solid. Even with hard, out of the saddle climbs at 700+ Watts, there was no movement whatsoever of the cover. It felt as fast as the Renn 575 disc that I raced on prior to getting my Powertap. And yes, it does even make the cool "whoosh, whoosh" sound of a normal disc wheel. I really like the look of the vinyl tape to hold the cover on as opposed to the fasteners. If I were to order another Aerojacket from Wheelbuilder, I think I would actually ask them not to drill the small holes around the perimeter for the fasteners and just use tape.
Overall, I think the Wheelbuilder Aerojacket is a fantastic product. It is by far the cheapest way to get the aerodynamic benefits of riding a disc wheel.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Multi-Tasking
Despite the fact that Jess says I am incapable of multi-tasking, I think that the hours spent on the bike trainer are a chunk of time that is very conducive to getting a couple of things done at once!
As a 3rd year medical student, my time is often limited and there seems to be an endless amount of material to study, so I find it very efficient and effective to get a little bit of studying done while cruising on the trainer. I have never really been able to do much of anything besides focus on running when I'm on the treadmill, but the monotony of long trainer rides down in the aerobars on the other hand, can definitely be broken up by watching videos, listening to lectures, or ocassionally flipping through flash cards or review books. During periods of the year like right now, when the major goal of many of my workouts is simply "base building", I find that I can really incorporate studying into my trainer routine pretty seamlessly. I often set up my laptop on a stand right in front of the handlebars so that I can watch or listen to lectures. I have also done workouts where I will go hard for 10 minutes or so, and then sit up and spin easily for 5-10 minutes while paging through a book or a stack of flashcards.
Although I firmly believe that one can easily multi-task during "base building" or "recovery" trainer workouts, I would say that I have never felt like I could effectively do it during my hard interval or tempo workouts. In those situations, I feel that focusing on my workout and listening to my body are critical and I am willing to sacrifice a little bit of sleep or free time to get my other work done afterwards. In addition, when I start to build up my mileage during race preparation I really enjoy the mental break and stress relief that my workouts provide from my busy schedule.
So overall, I would say try giving multi-tasking a shot for easy rides on the trainer, but keep the harder workouts as a separate time for focusing on your body and the task at hand.
As a 3rd year medical student, my time is often limited and there seems to be an endless amount of material to study, so I find it very efficient and effective to get a little bit of studying done while cruising on the trainer. I have never really been able to do much of anything besides focus on running when I'm on the treadmill, but the monotony of long trainer rides down in the aerobars on the other hand, can definitely be broken up by watching videos, listening to lectures, or ocassionally flipping through flash cards or review books. During periods of the year like right now, when the major goal of many of my workouts is simply "base building", I find that I can really incorporate studying into my trainer routine pretty seamlessly. I often set up my laptop on a stand right in front of the handlebars so that I can watch or listen to lectures. I have also done workouts where I will go hard for 10 minutes or so, and then sit up and spin easily for 5-10 minutes while paging through a book or a stack of flashcards.
Although I firmly believe that one can easily multi-task during "base building" or "recovery" trainer workouts, I would say that I have never felt like I could effectively do it during my hard interval or tempo workouts. In those situations, I feel that focusing on my workout and listening to my body are critical and I am willing to sacrifice a little bit of sleep or free time to get my other work done afterwards. In addition, when I start to build up my mileage during race preparation I really enjoy the mental break and stress relief that my workouts provide from my busy schedule.
So overall, I would say try giving multi-tasking a shot for easy rides on the trainer, but keep the harder workouts as a separate time for focusing on your body and the task at hand.
Added 2011 Race Calendar
I added a menu for my 2011 race calendar on the right. Check it out!
I'm still sorting out which sprint and/or olympic distance triathlons I will be doing this summer, so stay tuned for updates.
I'm still sorting out which sprint and/or olympic distance triathlons I will be doing this summer, so stay tuned for updates.
Owl's Roost & Wild Turkey Trails
Vance and I took out the mountain bikes to Lake Brandt in Greensboro, NC today. We started at Bur-Mil Park and rode Owl's Roost trail and then rode along the greenway to connect to Wild Turkey trail. We took a quick break at the marina and I slammed down a couple of Raspberry Hammer Gels before we reversed the whole ride and finished at Bur-Mil Park. Owl's Roost and Wild Turkey are each about 4.5 mi one way and the greenway connector piece in between the trails is about 0.3 mi. So all-in-all, the round trip ride ended up at about 18.6 mi.
Since I'm still in an easy "base building" mode and haven't started any organized iron distance training, I've really enjoyed getting out on the mountain bike more often. I definitely think that mountain biking is extremely beneficial to overall bike fitness. Not only does it drastically increase technical handling skills, but it is like a constant interval workout to really turn the legs over quickly and power up hills and obstacles. Also, it's just really fun! The trails out at Brandt Lake are definitely conducive to faster riding because they aren't super technical so you can really get a great 2+ hour workout in that doesn't beat you up too much like some trails seem to.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
REVOLUTION3 Cedar Point...It's Official!
I finally pulled the trigger and submitted my registration for the REVOLUTION 3 Cedar Point "full rev" on September 11, 2011! This will be my first full iron distance triathlon (ie. 2.4 mi swim, 112 mi bike, 26.2 mi run). I've been thinking hard about this for the past couple of months and yet there was something incredibly nerve-racking about actually clicking "submit registration". It's going to be a lot of work but I am extremely excited to make my iron distance debut and I think Rev3 Cedar Point will be the perfect place to do it!
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Pilot Mountain
I took the road bike out with my buddy Vance today and did a loop up to the summit of Pilot Mountain (40.4 mi). Thanks to the unseasonably warm 75 degree sun and 1,421 feet of climbing in about 2.5 miles, my legs are toast!
I tried out the Espresso flavor Hammer Gel today on the ride. If you like coffee flavored stuff you will love this! It's got a little kick of caffeine mixed in with it too, which gives you a nice boost. To be honest, I don't think I've found a flavor of Hammer Gel I don't like, but this one was especially good. Also, one thing that I think is really cool about the Hammer Gels is that dissolve readily in a bottle of water. If you don't like dealing with the sticky mess of a gel pack, but still want the flavor and carbohydrates from the Hammer Gel, try mixing it in your water bottle. It mixes just as well as all the Hammer powders!
I tried out the Espresso flavor Hammer Gel today on the ride. If you like coffee flavored stuff you will love this! It's got a little kick of caffeine mixed in with it too, which gives you a nice boost. To be honest, I don't think I've found a flavor of Hammer Gel I don't like, but this one was especially good. Also, one thing that I think is really cool about the Hammer Gels is that dissolve readily in a bottle of water. If you don't like dealing with the sticky mess of a gel pack, but still want the flavor and carbohydrates from the Hammer Gel, try mixing it in your water bottle. It mixes just as well as all the Hammer powders!
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Warrior Creek Trail
Thanks to the beautiful weather, Jess and I headed out to Wilkes County, NC today for the first mountain bike ride of the season. We did a lap on the Warrior Creek Trail (13.6 mi) at the W. Scott Kerr Dam & Reservoir. The trails out there are definitely the best I have ridden in NC!
Friday, February 25, 2011
Tri Bike Fit
A good fit on a triathlon bike is a critical component to success. Not only do you have to find a position that is powerful, but you have to balance the importance of aerodynamics and comfort into the equation. I am by no means an expert on the subject, but I have done a fair amount of reading and testing by trial and error. Dan Empfield (founder of Quintana Roo and webmaster of Slowtwitch.com) has a good series of articles that can be found here.
This is a video of my current fit on my 60 cm Kestrel Talon. The first thing I think about when dialing in my fit is the saddle height. Aerodynamic guru John Cobb has a good rule of thumb for choosing a saddle height, which is what I tend to use. He says saddle height = 0.889 x inseam (measured standing barefoot). After finding a good saddle height, I went through a lot of trial and error to find a good fore-aft position for my saddle and also for the drop to my aerobars. Basically, I wanted to get as low as possible withough compromising my power output. Generally, the lower I got in the front end, the more I had to slide my saddle forward to keep my hip angle open enough to feel powerful. I chose my stem length based simply on what felt comfortable. I wanted to feel relaxed and wanted to avoid feeling like I was holding my upper body weight with my shoulder and upper arm muscles. And last, the width of my aerobar elbow pads was determined by how close I could possibly get them without feeling like I was "pinching" my chest closed to a point where it would compromise my breathing.
I did a lot of interval workouts while I was dialing in my position to make sure that I could hit the same 20 minute power levels on my triathlon bike as I could on my road bike, which is a much more relaxed position.
I feel pretty good about my position, but I decided to poll the Slowtwitch.com audience by posting this video on the message board to see if I could pick up any free advice there. I'll post an update with any advice I get...
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Winter Wattage
First of all, if you really want to get serious about interval training on the bike, you absolutely MUST buy an indoor bike trainer. In my opinion, this is the #1 training tool for cyclists. There are many types of trainers and essentially all of them can get the job done. Maybe I'll make a separate post sometime that provides a more in-depth review of the trainers that I have tested... But breifly, the key thing to keep in mind when selecting a trainer, is that you never want to be able to "out-work" it (ie. if you are in your big ring in the front and smallest cog in the back and can still spin away, your trainer is not providing you with enough resistance). I prefer the fluid trainers because their ride quality most closely resembles the ride on the road and therefore I own a Kurt Kinetic Road Machine.
The second thing you need to get serious about interval training on the bike is a reliable way to measure workload. The easiest way to do this is with a power meter. Speedometers are not a good indicator of work on an indoor trainer for a couple of reasons. First, speed on the trainer does not equal speed on the road. Second, speed on the trainer is highly dependent on tire pressure and contact pressure between the rear wheel of the bike and the roller of the trainer. It is very hard to exactly control these variables so speed in one workout cannot be accurately compared to speed in a second workout. A rear hub powermeter like the Cycleops Powertap (which is what I have) will work great, but a crank-based system (like the SRM or Quarq, neither of which I have tried) works fine too. Power meters can certainly be pricey, but both the indoor trainer and the power meter are critical tools to becoming a better cyclist. I would buy these two things long before making any upgrades to my bike, buying fancy clothing, etc., if given the choice. Another thing to keep in mind is that Kurt Kinetic actually makes a "power meter" for their indoor trainers. This system can only be used when the bike is on the trainer, but it uses a mathematical calculation based on wheel speed and the known viscous properties of the fluid in the resistance unit to estimate approximate power output in watts. I have not tried this system, but I have heard that when compared to a true power meter like a Powertap, the Kurt Kinetic system typically overestimates wattage by ~10%. However, the key thing is that this system is consistent against itself, which is what is really important for measuring improvements. It seems like it would be a great way to start training with power cheaply.
So now, if you've already got your indoor trainer and a power meter, you're probably ready to hear the point of this post in the first place, which was my plan for how to utilize indoor training to improve your power output on the bike.
The basic idea for the following training plan was given to me by a road cyclist that I ocassionally train with. It's not fancy, and it really is not extremely time consuming, but it really does work! The disclaimer however, is that you cannot do this program for 1 week and expect to see results (maybe you will, I don't know). But the idea is that continuing with this type of interval training should help you to reach wattage goals at a rate of approximately 1 watt per week. I did these workouts for 12 weeks this winter and improved my functional threshold power (FTP) >12 watts by the end.
So here is the basic idea:
First, you need a baseline FTP to start with. I like to do this with a 20 minute all-out power test. Simply warm up, and then go at 100% effort for 20 minutes, then cool down. Take 95% of the average power for the 20 minute interval, and you have your current FTP. This will hurt, so beware!
Then, the weekly workouts look like this:
Tues: Warm up 15:00. 5 x 4:00 intervals @ 110% FTP w/ 2:00 recovery after each interval. 15:00 cool down.
Thurs: Warm up 5:00. 2 x 20:00 intervals @ 95% FTP w/ 10:00 recovery after each interval. 5:00 cool down.
Sat or Sun: Minumum 1:30:00 steady state ride at 75% FTP. Go longer if you've got the guts to do it on the trainer or if the weather is nice and you can get outside.
Every 4th week, choose a weekend day to re-check your FTP using the same 20 minute protocol you used at the beginning. Re-adjust the power goals for each workout according to this new FTP.
On the off days (Mon, Wed, Fri) I was doing some easy running and swimming. These trainer workouts are not too time consuming so you could easily work this program into a regular triathlon training schedule.
A final point to keep in mind when doing a lot of work on the trainer is that your fluid requirements increase drastically as compared to outside where you have the natural cooling of the wind. If you're anything like me, the sweat literally pools on the ground while on the trainer, so I make sure to replace not only my water loss, but electrolytes as well. I generally consume ~32 oz of Gu Electrolyte Brew for an hour workout on the trainer. Try the blueberry pomegranate if you haven't had it before, it's awesome!
The second thing you need to get serious about interval training on the bike is a reliable way to measure workload. The easiest way to do this is with a power meter. Speedometers are not a good indicator of work on an indoor trainer for a couple of reasons. First, speed on the trainer does not equal speed on the road. Second, speed on the trainer is highly dependent on tire pressure and contact pressure between the rear wheel of the bike and the roller of the trainer. It is very hard to exactly control these variables so speed in one workout cannot be accurately compared to speed in a second workout. A rear hub powermeter like the Cycleops Powertap (which is what I have) will work great, but a crank-based system (like the SRM or Quarq, neither of which I have tried) works fine too. Power meters can certainly be pricey, but both the indoor trainer and the power meter are critical tools to becoming a better cyclist. I would buy these two things long before making any upgrades to my bike, buying fancy clothing, etc., if given the choice. Another thing to keep in mind is that Kurt Kinetic actually makes a "power meter" for their indoor trainers. This system can only be used when the bike is on the trainer, but it uses a mathematical calculation based on wheel speed and the known viscous properties of the fluid in the resistance unit to estimate approximate power output in watts. I have not tried this system, but I have heard that when compared to a true power meter like a Powertap, the Kurt Kinetic system typically overestimates wattage by ~10%. However, the key thing is that this system is consistent against itself, which is what is really important for measuring improvements. It seems like it would be a great way to start training with power cheaply.
So now, if you've already got your indoor trainer and a power meter, you're probably ready to hear the point of this post in the first place, which was my plan for how to utilize indoor training to improve your power output on the bike.
The basic idea for the following training plan was given to me by a road cyclist that I ocassionally train with. It's not fancy, and it really is not extremely time consuming, but it really does work! The disclaimer however, is that you cannot do this program for 1 week and expect to see results (maybe you will, I don't know). But the idea is that continuing with this type of interval training should help you to reach wattage goals at a rate of approximately 1 watt per week. I did these workouts for 12 weeks this winter and improved my functional threshold power (FTP) >12 watts by the end.
So here is the basic idea:
First, you need a baseline FTP to start with. I like to do this with a 20 minute all-out power test. Simply warm up, and then go at 100% effort for 20 minutes, then cool down. Take 95% of the average power for the 20 minute interval, and you have your current FTP. This will hurt, so beware!
Then, the weekly workouts look like this:
Tues: Warm up 15:00. 5 x 4:00 intervals @ 110% FTP w/ 2:00 recovery after each interval. 15:00 cool down.
Thurs: Warm up 5:00. 2 x 20:00 intervals @ 95% FTP w/ 10:00 recovery after each interval. 5:00 cool down.
Sat or Sun: Minumum 1:30:00 steady state ride at 75% FTP. Go longer if you've got the guts to do it on the trainer or if the weather is nice and you can get outside.
Every 4th week, choose a weekend day to re-check your FTP using the same 20 minute protocol you used at the beginning. Re-adjust the power goals for each workout according to this new FTP.
On the off days (Mon, Wed, Fri) I was doing some easy running and swimming. These trainer workouts are not too time consuming so you could easily work this program into a regular triathlon training schedule.
A final point to keep in mind when doing a lot of work on the trainer is that your fluid requirements increase drastically as compared to outside where you have the natural cooling of the wind. If you're anything like me, the sweat literally pools on the ground while on the trainer, so I make sure to replace not only my water loss, but electrolytes as well. I generally consume ~32 oz of Gu Electrolyte Brew for an hour workout on the trainer. Try the blueberry pomegranate if you haven't had it before, it's awesome!
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Sports Bistro
I am very pleased to announce that I have been selected as a member of Team Sports Bistro for the 2011 racing season! For me this is really the ideal sponsorship opportunity because the founders of the company are so down to earth and really interested in working with athletes and counseling them on nutrition.
Whenever you are in the market for sports nutrition products, be sure to check out sportsbistro.com. Not only are their prices fantastic, but every single product on the site has been tested and reviewed by a Team Sports Bistro athlete. Sports Bistro really stands behind the products that they offer and don't sell anything that hasn't gotten the "thumbs up" from one of their athletes. In addition, if you ask me, I can give you a 10% off coupon code!
Whenever you are in the market for sports nutrition products, be sure to check out sportsbistro.com. Not only are their prices fantastic, but every single product on the site has been tested and reviewed by a Team Sports Bistro athlete. Sports Bistro really stands behind the products that they offer and don't sell anything that hasn't gotten the "thumbs up" from one of their athletes. In addition, if you ask me, I can give you a 10% off coupon code!
Blog Post Number One
I've never really been much of a "blogger", but with all of my time constraints lately, I have been feeling like I needed a good outlet to share events in my life with friends and family. The theme of my blog, "Pain-Endurance-Character-Hope", is taken from Romans chapter 5; a passage that I have always felt like had a lot of resonance in my own life. Rejoicing, even in suffering and pain, certainly helps one to endure, which builds character to ultimately solidify hope in Christ. This though process is something that I aim to apply to all aspects of my life. If you know me, you know that I have always been quite interested in endurace events (mostly running and triathlons) and although it may seem like a stretch, this passage from Romans 5 is something that I find gives me perserverance in my training and racing. I also try to apply this way of thinking to my journey through medical school.
So, this blog really could go any direction, but I imagine it largely detailing my interest in triathlons and the joys and stressors of going through my last year of medical school and the elusive residency "match" in the spring of 2012. Some personal interests in training methodology and nutrition are likely to fill up a lot of my blog posts, so stay tuned for things like winter training programs and the long process of building up to my first iron-distance triathlon this fall!
So, this blog really could go any direction, but I imagine it largely detailing my interest in triathlons and the joys and stressors of going through my last year of medical school and the elusive residency "match" in the spring of 2012. Some personal interests in training methodology and nutrition are likely to fill up a lot of my blog posts, so stay tuned for things like winter training programs and the long process of building up to my first iron-distance triathlon this fall!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)